Thanks Manav! Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro. Excuze typofraphicak errows
On Dec 23, 2015, at 23:44, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > 1. Remove the multiple sessions terminating on the same target example from > the use-case document. > 2. Change the base s-bfd draft to only advertise 1 discriminator > 3. Leave the IGP drafts as is. as we have to do point (2) in any case, if the IGP drafts are changed or remain, I would think this is the most efficient way to get out of the troubles. Great. Will do that. Makes a nice test case: send multiple S-BFD discriminators in the subtlv and see how the test unit behaves ;-) > And i was convinced by some folks working for the same vendor to include the > possibility of supporting multiple discriminators per node since the > line cards can keep conking off ! ;-) well, they can ;-) but the way it is implemented right now I think we can solve the problem without a 2nd discriminator. Wow. Some serious architectural changes have gone in since then and now, eh? ;-) Cheers, Manav
