Hi Jeff,
we have not expected this question that early ☺
Yes, there’s IPR associated with these drafts that would be properly disclosed
after the meeting.
Regards,
Greg
From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 3:23 PM
To: Gregory Mirsky
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; Alia Atlas ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Two new drafts on (micro-)BFD over MC-LAG interfaces
Working Group,
These documents reasonably extend the existing BFD on LAG mechanism and would
be reasonably in charter for BFD to pick up.
Greg, given that adoption seems a reasonable course, could you and the other
co-authors state whether there's any known IPR on these documents?
-- Jeff
On Apr 4, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Gregory Mirsky
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear All,
two new drafts, related to RFC 7130, were published before the meeting:
• BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP
network<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip-00>
• BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP/MPLS
network<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-mpls-00>
Greatly appreciate your reviews, comments, questions and suggestions.
Regards,
Greg
