Hi Jeff, Thanks!
IPR will be disclosed ASAP, we are pushing legal. Regards, Jeff On Apr 4, 2016, at 7:31 PM, Gregory Mirsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Jeff, we have not expected this question that early :) Yes, there’s IPR associated with these drafts that would be properly disclosed after the meeting. Regards, Greg From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 3:23 PM To: Gregory Mirsky Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Alia Atlas ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Subject: Re: Two new drafts on (micro-)BFD over MC-LAG interfaces Working Group, These documents reasonably extend the existing BFD on LAG mechanism and would be reasonably in charter for BFD to pick up. Greg, given that adoption seems a reasonable course, could you and the other co-authors state whether there's any known IPR on these documents? -- Jeff On Apr 4, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Gregory Mirsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear All, two new drafts, related to RFC 7130, were published before the meeting: • BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP network<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip-00> • BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP/MPLS network<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-mpls-00> Greatly appreciate your reviews, comments, questions and suggestions. Regards, Greg
