Hi, Does it make sense to change "seamless BFD" with "stateless BFD" in the documents? Its very convoluted to explain whats "seamless" about S-BFD.
We called it "seamless" because it was simple and largely stateless. Any suggestions? Cheers, Manav
- Replace "seamless" with "statel... Manav Bhatia
- Re: Replace "seamless" with &qu... Sam Aldrin
- Re: Replace "seamless" with... Manav Bhatia
- RE: Replace "seamless" ... Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: Replace "seamless&qu... Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: Replace "seamle... Manav Bhatia
- Re: Replace "se... Jeffrey Haas
