Adding John (AD).
On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch
<[email protected]> wrote:
From: Reshad Rahman <[email protected]>
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03
<I should have sent this a few weeks ago when it got done>
FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's
been submitted to the RFC Editor.
<tp>
Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue. Whatever
was done would appear to have been not enough. I was expecting an action by
the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant.
Tom Petch
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD
module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd <[email protected]> on behalf of Reshad Rahman
<[email protected]>
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>
> BFD WG,
>
> Draft minutes have been posted @
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
>
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> <tp>
>
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD
YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can
progress.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Copying the LSR WG.
>
>
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
