RFC Editor state is MISSREF, as part of cluster C336: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C336. If I’m untangling the information there correctly, I think it’s blocked on (at least) draft-ietf-teas-yang-te.
Was the surgery that Tom mentions, expected to clear it out of MISSREF? If so, please give me some more details (either in this thread or offline) and I can check in with the RFC Editor. Thanks, —John On Jul 27, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Reshad Rahman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Adding John (AD). On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: From: Reshad Rahman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03 <I should have sent this a few weeks ago when it got done> FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's been submitted to the RFC Editor. <tp> Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue. Whatever was done would appear to have been not enough. I was expecting an action by the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant. Tom Petch Regards, Reshad. On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress. Thanks, Yingzhen > On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > From: Rtg-bfd <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Reshad Rahman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58 > To: rtg-bfd@ietf.<mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.> org > Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110 > > BFD WG, > > Draft minutes have been posted @ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TG4x_ssMaQlMDdVu3BrBywJ1enW0qjsLSg-0f9CKkecSVPEAfcfXuCwr08mLUw$> > > Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd. > <tp> > > I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can progress. > > Tom Petch > > Copying the LSR WG. > > > Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TG4x_ssMaQlMDdVu3BrBywJ1enW0qjsLSg-0f9CKkecSVPEAfcfXuCzjX4ck5A$> > > Regards, > Reshad. > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TG4x_ssMaQlMDdVu3BrBywJ1enW0qjsLSg-0f9CKkecSVPEAfcfXuCwv9DZorg$>
