Hi Jeff, Thanks a lot for your detailed review and comments.
We will give you feedback soon. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng ----邮件原文----发件人：Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]>收件人：rtg-bfd <[email protected]>抄 送: (无)发送时间：2023-03-22 00:02:07主题：WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023)Working Group,https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/05/The authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo have requested WGLC.The draft, in my opinion, is in fairly good shape. However, since itfunctions via looping packets back to itself and trying to exercise thenormal RFC 5880 state machine behaviors to a large extent, the draft coulduse very high scrutiny for several matters:- Does the state machine behave appropriately at all stages?- Are the descriptions of the values of the BFD fields clear in all cases?Please supply the authors and the Working Group with your feedback.The intended finish date for this WGLC is 7 April, 2023. This is one weekafter the end of IETF 116.Note that Reshad is an author on the draft, so I39ll be handling the full setof review and shepherding work.-- JeffSubject：WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023)Working Group,https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/05/The authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo have requested WGLC.The draft, in my opinion, is in fairly good shape. However, since itfunctions via looping packets back to itself and trying to exercise thenormal RFC 5880 state machine behaviors to a large extent, the draft coulduse very high scrutiny for several matters:- Does the state machine behave appropriately at all stages?- Are the descriptions of the values of the BFD fields clear in all cases?Please supply the authors and the Working Group with your feedback.The intended finish date for this WGLC is 7 April, 2023. This is one weekafter the end of IETF 116.Note that Reshad is an author on the draft, so I39ll be handling the full setof review and shepherding work.-- Jeff
