It seems my post was missed by the archive, so try again.

Dear Eric,






I've posted a new -12 version incorporating all the proposed text changes. Link 
as below.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-12

Thanks,
Xiao Min






From: EricVyncke(evyncke) <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Cc: Weiqiang Cheng <[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;肖敏10093570;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;Dhruv Dhody 
<[email protected]>;Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>;tjw ietf 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;
Date: 2024年10月10日 15:50
Subject: Next step after IETF Last Call of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo



Dear authors and WG,
 
While there were no Last Call comments from the IETF community, there were some 
from the Last Call directorate reviews and I have seen Xiao and others replies, 
thanks for being reactive.
 
INTDIR, by Tim Wicinski, 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/rYMojOLlnTSHxNSzTlRk0KYtWNo/ 
(seems to be addressed)
OPSDIR, by Dhruv Dhody, 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/XtakGncqU3Agq7on7bi--la4HT8/ 
(seems to be addressed)
RTGDIR, by Adrian Farrel, 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/m-aXPACIFXmfykEQYnnvdufvT4M/ 
(seems to be addressed except perhaps for comments about section 4)
SECDIR, by Stephen Farrel, 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/u_HwDrwJNPTnCjlXhefZ9694bwQ/ 
(unsure whether it is resolved)
 
Please submit a revised I-D with all the proposed text changes, then I am 
preparing the IESG ballot, possibly already for next Thursday or at the latest 
on October 24th.
 
Regards
 
-éric

Reply via email to