Xiao Thanks for your quick reaction, I have checked whether the discussed updates to the text are actually in the text and as they are, I have created the ballot for the next IESG formal telechat in one week. Please note that this is a rather short time before the telechat, i.e., some ADs may want to defer the evaluation to the 24th of October.
Regards -éric From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 10 October 2024 at 11:10 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Next step after IETF Last Call of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo Dear Eric, I've posted a new -12 version incorporating all the proposed text changes. Link as below. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-12 Thanks, Xiao Min Original From: EricVyncke(evyncke) <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Cc: Weiqiang Cheng <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;肖敏10093570;[email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>;Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>;tjw ietf <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>; Date: 2024年10月10日 15:50 Subject: Next step after IETF Last Call of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo Dear authors and WG, While there were no Last Call comments from the IETF community, there were some from the Last Call directorate reviews and I have seen Xiao and others replies, thanks for being reactive. INTDIR, by Tim Wicinski, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/rYMojOLlnTSHxNSzTlRk0KYtWNo/ (seems to be addressed) OPSDIR, by Dhruv Dhody, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/XtakGncqU3Agq7on7bi--la4HT8/ (seems to be addressed) RTGDIR, by Adrian Farrel, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/m-aXPACIFXmfykEQYnnvdufvT4M/ (seems to be addressed except perhaps for comments about section 4) SECDIR, by Stephen Farrel, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/u_HwDrwJNPTnCjlXhefZ9694bwQ/ (unsure whether it is resolved) Please submit a revised I-D with all the proposed text changes, then I am preparing the IESG ballot, possibly already for next Thursday or at the latest on October 24th. Regards -éric
