Jeff, thanks for the changes, all good for -23.
I'll look into the Yahoo yuckiness (sorry).
Regards,Reshad.
On Sunday, March 2, 2025 at 09:31:58 PM GMT+4, Jeffrey Haas
<[email protected]> wrote:
Reshad,
Meta-note: Yahoo does terrible things for text/plain forms of its html. It
squished all bullet items onto a single line. Yuck.
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 05:31:32AM +0000, Reshad Rahman wrote:
> Comments/questions/nits:
> - There are still 2 instances of "stronger authentication" in the doc, see
> my previous comment on -21 on the use of "stronger authentication". Should
> this instead be "strong authentication". e.g. Section 1.3 has "with a
> stronger authentication", should that be "with strong authentication"?
I'll make those changes.
> - Section 3 "an less computationally intensive" -> "a less computationally
> intensive"
This will be fixed.
> - Section 4 2nd paragraph: in "using the strong authentication for an
> interval", are we missing "mode" or "method" after "strong authentication"?
Mode is appropriate here.
> - Please add Qiufang and Stephen who did the YD and SECDIR reviews
> respectively. AFAIK there's no requirement to do so, but I believe it's good
> form.
I've added an acknolwedgments section.
-- Jeff
