IP is addressed via MPLS. If IP forwarding were to be used exclusively, then it becomes complicated. With MPLS being extended to more parts of the network than just the core, it seems that is not as much of a concern.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15/11/2011 21:36, Sriganesh Kini wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree that having a solution with full coverage is very useful >> because it removes the need for complicated analysis to determine what >> is protected versus what is not (and worse, how that changes as the >> topology change). But the solution has to be simple for it to get >> deployed. >> >> One approach using MPLS that solves this using extensions to a single >> protocol (LDP) is given in draft-kini-mpls-frr-ldp. > > It the approach extensible to an IP context? > > Stewart > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > -- - Sri _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
