Hi, Yes/support
Regards, Jeff From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Retana, Alvaro Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 7:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Adoption of the MRT Architecture Draft as WG Document Hi! As discussed at the meeting in Taipei, this e-mail is a call for adoption of the MRT Architecture draft as a WG item. There was strong support in the room. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-atlas-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture As was also suggested at the meeting, the multicast-related sections (4.3 and 4.4) will be moved into a separate document (to be discussed separately). It was also brought up that the draft has an IPR claim attached to it. The following links are to the IPR claim and to the application itself (provided by the authors): https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/ http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2010055408&recNum=1&docAn=IB2009007467&queryString=FP:%28PCT/IB2009/007467%29&maxRec=1<blocked::http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2010055408&recNum=1&docAn=IB2009007467&queryString=FP:(PCT/IB2009/007467)&maxRec=1> As a reminder, having an IPR claim does not disqualify a draft from advancing in the IETF, being adopted by a working group or from eventually becoming a standard. It just represents one more item to be considered by the working group. http://www.ietf.org/ipr/policy.html Please post your opinions and votes about adoption to the list. We will keep this discussion open until Dec/12, 2011. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
