Support. Andrew
On Nov 28, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Retana, Alvaro wrote: > Hi! > > As discussed at the meeting in Taipei, this e-mail is a call for adoption of > the MRT Architecture draft as a WG item. There was strong support in the > room. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-atlas-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture > > As was also suggested at the meeting, the multicast-related sections (4.3 and > 4.4) will be moved into a separate document (to be discussed separately). > > > It was also brought up that the draft has an IPR claim attached to it. The > following links are to the IPR claim and to the application itself (provided > by the authors): > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/ > http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2010055408&recNum=1&docAn=IB2009007467&queryString=FP:%28PCT/IB2009/007467%29&maxRec=1 > > As a reminder, having an IPR claim does not disqualify a draft from advancing > in the IETF, being adopted by a working group or from eventually becoming a > standard. It just represents one more item to be considered by the working > group. http://www.ietf.org/ipr/policy.html > > > Please post your opinions and votes about adoption to the list. We will keep > this discussion open until Dec/12, 2011. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
