Support as co-author.
Ning So
---- Reply message -----
From: "Alia Atlas" <akatlas at gmail.com>
To: <rtgwg at ietf.org>
Subject: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft
Date: Wed, May 30, 2012 11:58 am
draft-shand-remote-lfa was presented favorably this last IETF. There
is known IPR
associated with it on file ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1770/ )
This draft presents
a solution for IP/LDP fast-reroute that does not guarantee 100%
coverage but can substantially
improve coverage over LFAs.
We would like to initiate a WG poll to determine whether to adopt
draft-shand-remote-lfa.
We are, of course, interested in opinions and reasoning rather than
simple yes/no.
Thanks,
Alia
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
