Support R. ----- Reply message ----- From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <[email protected]> To: "Alia Atlas" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft Date: Fri, Jun 1, 2012 13:37
Support eric > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alia Atlas > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft > > draft-shand-remote-lfa was presented favorably this last IETF. There > is known IPR > associated with it on file ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1770/ ) > This draft presents > a solution for IP/LDP fast-reroute that does not guarantee 100% > coverage but can substantially > improve coverage over LFAs. > > We would like to initiate a WG poll to determine whether to adopt > draft-shand-remote-lfa. > We are, of course, interested in opinions and reasoning rather than > simple yes/no. > > Thanks, > Alia > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
