Just to close the loop.. This issue has been fixed and the IPR now shows up.
Alvaro. On 12/12/12 7:09 AM, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There was a declaration against draft-shand-remote-lfa-0, but the chairs did not set the replacement status correctly when draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-00 was published, so the new draft did not automatically inherit the existing IPR disclosure. Please can the chairs email the secretariat and request that they correct the meta-data so that the WG draft draft picks up IPR disclosure 1770 in the tracker.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
