Looks OK here - does one of us have a caching problem?
Can you provide the exact path that fails so we can get it fixed.
Stewart
On 25/01/2013 16:16, Hannes Gredler wrote:
hi alvaro,
i see now the disclosure when i use the IPR search function - e.g.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa
thanks for fixing this.
what is still broken is the IPR column (=empty) in the rtgwg master page.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/
thanks,
/hannes
On Dec 19, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
Just to close the loop.. This issue has been fixed and the IPR now shows up.
Alvaro.
On 12/12/12 7:09 AM, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <[email protected]> wrote:
There was a declaration against draft-shand-remote-lfa-0,
but the chairs did not set the replacement status correctly
when draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-00 was published, so
the new draft did not automatically inherit the existing
IPR disclosure.
Please can the chairs email the secretariat and request
that they correct the meta-data so that the WG draft draft
picks up IPR disclosure 1770 in the tracker.
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
