Although I don’t have a vote, mine would be yes for having these Routing YANG models homed in the rtgwg.
From: Alia Atlas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 12:08 AM To: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, The IESG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Routing ADs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Adrian Farrel's Yes on charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-02: (with COMMENT) Adrian, Adding an explicit inclusion for routing-related YANG models not in other working groups sounds good to me. Thanks for the catch and having a helpful extra pointer/encouragement. How does adding it as an explicit larger work item such as: "The specific larger topics that RTGWG is currently chartered to work on: * .... * Routing-related YANG models that are not appropriate for other RTG working groups. This may include generic routing YANG models. " Thoughts? Alia On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-02: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-rtgwg/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Fully support this: a good change. I do not believe this change needs to go for external review. Nit... s/an optional venue/a venue/ (There is nothing in "a venue" that implies compulsion) --- Just noticed something we should add: RTGWG would be a really good home for routing-related YANG models that are not specifically covered by other RTG working groups, and for generic routing YANG models. Could this be added as a work item?
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
