Acee, Your opinion, perspective, and willingness to review and work on the drafts is always welcome.
Regards, Alia On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > Although I don’t have a vote, mine would be yes for having these Routing > YANG models homed in the rtgwg. > > From: Alia Atlas <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 12:08 AM > To: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, The IESG <[email protected]>, Routing ADs < > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: Adrian Farrel's Yes on charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-02: (with > COMMENT) > > Adrian, > > Adding an explicit inclusion for routing-related YANG models not in > other working groups > sounds good to me. Thanks for the catch and having a helpful extra > pointer/encouragement. > > How does adding it as an explicit larger work item such as: > > "The specific larger topics that RTGWG is currently chartered to work on: > > * .... > > * Routing-related YANG models that are not appropriate for other RTG > working groups. This > may include generic routing YANG models. > " > > Thoughts? > > Alia > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-02: Yes >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-rtgwg/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Fully support this: a good change. >> >> I do not believe this change needs to go for external review. >> >> Nit... >> s/an optional venue/a venue/ >> (There is nothing in "a venue" that implies compulsion) >> >> --- >> >> Just noticed something we should add: >> RTGWG would be a really good home for routing-related YANG models that >> are not specifically covered by other RTG working groups, and for generic >> routing YANG models. >> Could this be added as a work item? >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
