Hi Stephane,

/chair hat off

IMO in disjoined topologies one should have flexibility to enable/disable LFA 
as per AF.


Cheers,
Jeff

From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 11:21 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: LFA manageability : per AF config => feedback required

Hi Folks,

As you know, LFA manageability draft is in final phasis …
The current document states per AF granularity activation as a SHOULD.
“
5.1<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-07#section-5.1>.
  LFA enabling/disabling scope





   The granularity of LFA activation should be controlled (as alternate

   nexthop consume memory in forwarding plane).



   An implementation of LFA SHOULD allow its activation with the

   following criteria:



   o  Per address-family : ipv4 unicast, ipv6 unicast, LDP IPv4 unicast,

      LDP IPv6 unicast ...



   o  Per routing context : VRF, virtual/logical router, global routing

      table, ...


“

In the framework of ISIS/OSPF yang modelization, we are challenging this 
statement, do we really need to force implementation to support this “per AF” 
granularity ?

Please provide as soon as possible your feedback on this and also provide clear 
drivers to support or not per AF activation of LFA.


Thanks for your help !


[Orange logo]<http://www.orange.com/>

Stephane Litkowski
Network Architect
Orange/SCE/EQUANT/IBNF/ENDD/NDE
Orange Expert Future Networks
phone: +33 2 23 28 49 83 
<https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%202%2023%2028%2049%2083%20>
mobile: +33 6 37 86 97 52 
<https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%206%2037%2086%2097%2052%20>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to