Hi Les,
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, February 23, 2015 at 11:46 AM
To: Pushpasis Sarkar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jeff
Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: LFA manageability : per AF config => feedback required
[Les:] "backup-selection-policy" specifies which member of an LFA set should be
preferred when there are multiple candidates for protecting a given prefix.
What we are discussing here is controlling which prefixes are eligible for
protection. These ae two different concepts.
[Pushpasis] Well, it is not only preferring. It can also be not-preferring-any
(or pruning). So if no protection for any IPv6 is required, it can be achieved
by a policy as belows:
Destination ipv6-all {
{
Interface all
{
Neighbor exclude all;
}
}
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
