Acee, On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 05:49:28PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > I’ve read all the E-mails in this thread and I think I agree with Stephane in > that a route has one or more tags that are advertised within the protocols > and are installed into the appropriate RIB. This is the most straight forward > and useful application of tags. > > I think having two types of tags for routes (local and IGP) will only add > complexity and confusion.
What do you think the model should say about redistribution of tags that are out of range of the protocol in question? What do you think, if anything, the model should have in the way of constraints on this scenario? Note that this is a leading question since we don't get constraints on operational state until yang 1.1, if I recall correctly. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
