On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 08:20:51PM +0000, Antoni Przygienda wrote: > > That's really where we're heading with regard to this model. While BGP is > > obviously the first target, this is also the beginnings of a fundamental > > policy > > algebra that multiple protocols may share. > > > [Tony saiz:] > > Interesting, we're bringing RPSL back ?
I missed the RPSL wars, but got to heavily soak in their results for a few years. :-) I think we'll see this go a lot further than RPSL since we're really dealing with internal router configuration rather than trying to express such policy in an inter-provider scenario. > And if so, providers are willing to share their policies finally ;-) ? Not a chance. What's mildly amusing is that some discussions about route-leak mitigation (see discussion in grow and (s)idr) may have implications about "disclosing enough" to do the job. I owe those WGs a writeup of the idea. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
