On August 26, 2015 6:24:19 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:41:26AM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> > Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models (including vendor
>> > models!) will be based on something more technical than the fact that
>> > a group of people "really like it" some other way.
>>
>> I'm equally unsure that having an argument of "I got there first" is a
>> compelling argument given the number of folks (including vendors) who
>> have stated willingness (or even support) for change. I think having a
>> major class of users stand up and say this is important should garner
>> some notice.
>
>Please keep in mind that we are talking about several published
>proposed standards that have been implemented and deployed. I think
>there must be convincing technical reasons to declare them broken and
>to redo them.
Other than adding /device at the top, we are not obsoleting RFC 7223. The
current device model keeps the interfaces configuration silo and merely
augments it with a binding to the logical-networking-element.
For the sake of clarity, these are the YANG data models that are
published as Proposed Standard RFCs:
- RFC 6022 NETCONF Monitoring
- RFC 6536 NETCONF Access Control Model
- RFC 7223 Interface Management
- RFC 7277 IP Management
- RFC 7317 System Management
- RFC 7407 SNMP Configuration
I see text in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00 that seems to
affect pretty much all of them.
Agreed. Although we're proposing reusing / rehoming them.
I also do not see "augments it (RFC
7223) with a binding to the logical-networking-element" in the YANG
fragment in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00.
This omission has been pointed out before. We need to fix that.
Lou
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
