Hi, Please find below some comments on the draft based on ID nits:
** The abstract seems to contain references ([I-D.ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture]), which it shouldn't. Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question. ** There are 2 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 6 characters in excess of 72. == There are 6 instances of lines with non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses in the document. If these are example addresses, they should be changed. == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt' is defined on line 5298, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses' is defined on line 5309, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'LFARevisited' is defined on line 5334, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'LightweightNotVia' is defined on line 5341, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'RFC3137' is defined on line 5358, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'RFC5286' is defined on line 5369, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'RFC5714' is defined on line 5374, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'RFC6571' is defined on line 5378, but no explicit reference was found in the text -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2327 (Obsoleted by RFC 4566) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3137 (Obsoleted by RFC 6987)
Best regards, Janos _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
