Hi Michael,
Thanks for detailed feedback, Would be grand, if you could send the authors a list of commonly used types that in your opinion should be included. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff From: wangzitao <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 01:54 To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>, RTGWG <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 'rtgwg-chairs' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types Hi RTGWG, I have read this document and I believe it useful and valuable. And yes, I support to adopt it. Otherwise, some types defined in this model can used by LIME WG’s “draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam” and “ draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods”. As the lime model’s coauthor, I’d like to reuse your types, update lime model to keep it synchronized. Best Regards! -Michael 发件人: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Jeff Tantsura 发送时间: 2016年12月1日 6:15 收件人: RTGWG 抄送: [email protected]; 'rtgwg-chairs' 主题: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types. The draft has been presented in Seoul, and found of interest for wg. Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2016. IPR: If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email. of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Thanks, Jeff & Chris
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
