Hi Michael,
From: wangzitao <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, December 9, 2016 at 5:22 AM
To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jeff Tantsura
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Routing WG
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc:
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
'rtgwg-chairs'
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types
Hi Jeff,
Sorry for late response.
I review the document again, and the types we can reusing are:
route-distinguisher; multicast-source-ipv4-addr-type;
multicast-source-ipv6-addr-type.
Note that for naming consistency with the existing ietf-ip-types types, I have
proposed changing:
multicast-source-ipv4-addr-type->ipv4-multicast-source-address
multicast-source-ipv6-addr-type->ipv6-multicast-source-address
And potential type which we need to use in LIME are:
tunnel-id, ip-mulitcast-group-address, lsp-id, system-id.
I see we could pick up the definitions from your models.
Thanks,
Acee
Hi Acee,
You are right, the lower-case identifiers are good for us.
Best Regards!
-Michael
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2016年12月7日 5:18
收件人: Jeff Tantsura; wangzitao; RTGWG
抄送:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
'rtgwg-chairs'
主题: Re: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types
Hi Michael, Jeff,
Actually, I’ve found these definitions in
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-02.txt. One
point, I see that some of the types in this draft are mixed case. Unless I
heard a good reason not to, we will stick with lower-case identifiers
consistent with RFC 6021 (existing YANG types RFC). Comments?
Thanks
Acee
From: rtgwg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf
of Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 1:59 PM
To: wangzitao <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Routing WG
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc:
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
'rtgwg-chairs'
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types
Hi Michael,
Thanks for detailed feedback,
Would be grand, if you could send the authors a list of commonly used types
that in your opinion should be included.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Jeff
From: wangzitao <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 01:54
To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
RTGWG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc:
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
'rtgwg-chairs'
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types
Hi RTGWG,
I have read this document and I believe it useful and valuable.
And yes, I support to adopt it.
Otherwise, some types defined in this model can used by LIME WG’s
“draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam<https://tools.ietf.org/wg/lime/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/>”
and “
draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods<https://tools.ietf.org/wg/lime/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods/>”.
As the lime model’s coauthor, I’d like to reuse your types, update lime model
to keep it synchronized.
Best Regards!
-Michael
发件人: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Jeff Tantsura
发送时间: 2016年12月1日 6:15
收件人: RTGWG
抄送:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
'rtgwg-chairs'
主题: RTGWG adoption of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types
Dear RTGWG,
The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt
draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-routing-types.
The draft has been presented in Seoul, and found of interest for wg.
Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2016.
IPR:
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this
email.
of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be
sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and each
individual that has contributed to the document.
Thanks,
Jeff & Chris
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
