> If the state of the bit is modified as part of the flooding I don't see how this > works since it would also require recalculation of the > checksum/authentication hash - and the LSP would no longer "look like" the > original.
You are correct -- I missed this. It kept naggling in the back of my mind that I wanted this to be a part of the packet, not the lsp, but I couldn't think why. The DNR bit needs to be in the packet header, but there are no bits there. Any ideas? :-) Russ _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
