hi russ, On 3/7/17 14:33, Russ White wrote: > >> If the state of the bit is modified as part of the flooding I don't see > how this >> works since it would also require recalculation of the >> checksum/authentication hash - and the LSP would no longer "look like" the >> original. > > You are correct -- I missed this. It kept naggling in the back of my mind > that I wanted this to be a part of the packet, not the lsp, but I couldn't > think why. The DNR bit needs to be in the packet header, but there are no > bits there. Any ideas?
functional MAC addresses ? All-L2-IS-DNR All-L1-IS-DNR /hannes _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
