Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> writes:

> Dear RTGWG,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types believe that the
> draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).
>
> Before we do the WGLC we want to do the IPR poll on the draft.
>
> This email is to start the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types?

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types.

Thanks,
Chris.

>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each and every author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff & Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to