I am not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types. Thanks, Yingzhen
-----Original Message----- From: Xufeng Liu [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 7:39 AM To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>; RTGWG <[email protected]> Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types I am not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:36 AM > To: RTGWG <[email protected]> > Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing- > [email protected] > Subject: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types > > Dear RTGWG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types believe that the draft > is ready for working group last call (WGLC). > > Before we do the WGLC we want to do the IPR poll on the draft. > > This email is to start the IPR poll. > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types? > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond > to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any > relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing > list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a > response has been received from each and every author and contributor. > > If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thanks, > Jeff & Chris > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
