Hi Kathleen,
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be good to call out the elements that are identifiers in the security
considerations section as the ones that might have an impact on security and
privacy. The text in 7950 is good, but just adding something to list the
identifiers or state that identifiers may be of concern would be an
improvement. Thanks.
This draft only contains the typedefs and not the leave instances.
The privacy considerations should be on the instances, so the typedef usage.
For example, the privacy considerations would be different if the
instance is read only or read write.
Regards, Benoit
.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
