Hi Kathleen,
On 10/11/17, 12:02 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Kathleen, >> >>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for >>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: No Objection >>> >>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>> >>> >>> Please refer to >>>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>> >>> >>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> COMMENT: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> It would be good to call out the elements that are identifiers in the >>> security >>> considerations section as the ones that might have an impact on >>>security >>> and >>> privacy. The text in 7950 is good, but just adding something to list >>>the >>> identifiers or state that identifiers may be of concern would be an >>> improvement. Thanks. >> >> This draft only contains the typedefs and not the leave instances. >> The privacy considerations should be on the instances, so the typedef >>usage. >> For example, the privacy considerations would be different if the >>instance >> is read only or read write. > >Thanks for the quick reply. Could that be made clear instead of a >vague sentence in the Security Considerations then so the >considerations are understood (an minimal)? Are you familiar with the YANG language? Would it make it less vague if if “data definitions” were replaced by “type definitions (i.e., typedef statements)” and “security considerations” were replaced by “security and privacy consideration”? Thanks, Acee > >Thanks, >Kathleen >> >> Regards, Benoit >>> >>> >>> >>> . >>> >> > > > >-- > >Best regards, >Kathleen _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
