Muthu and all,I do not see how the draft in quesrion us related to "SR Policy". >From my POV its scope is a SR LSP comprised of multiple Node SIDs within a >single IGP domain, and it provides local fast protection against failure of a >node that terminates one of the segments comprising this LSP. Pritection >action is performed by the penultimate node. My 2c.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:27, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal<[email protected]> wrote: Section 5.3 of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa describes protecting SR policy midpoints against node failure for the case where the active segment is the prefix or adjacency segment of a neighbor. I believe the steps described in the procedure is applicable only for a node steering packets into the SR policy. This could be an ingress PE steering IP packets into a SR-TE tunnel or an intermediate node steering labeled packets received with a BSID into a SR-TE tunnel identified by that BSID. A transit node that has no idea about the SR policy itself is not expected to perform the procedure described in that section. Is my understanding correct? Regards,Muthu_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
