Support and have a following comment and want to see this addressed.

Section 2:

 I saw SPF computation time has been discussed, while it is true this is 
relatively a smaller issue when compared to mismatch in SPF delay with 
different trigger algos across various vendors; it depends on the size of the 
network + mix of legacy and new nodes.
 Any ways, my comment:
  I would like to see add one more bullet point with regard to SPF computation 
order impact on the micro loops  for a trigger i.e., a trigger which is common 
to multiple levels/areas, multiple topologies and multiple SPF-algorithms (in 
extreme case).
 There is no specified order today and its implementation dependent and IMO 
this too would be a significant contributor (of course, not asking to specify 
the order here) and visible once the SPF delay/trigger-algo issue is fixed 
across. So this is worth being listed here.


--
Uma C.

From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:19 AM
To: RTGWG <[email protected]>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>
Subject: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement


RTGWG,

This email starts the two week WG last call for 
draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement/


<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement/>

Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this

informational document, along with the reasoning behind that support or

opposition.



IPR:

If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to

this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The

response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will

not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from

each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.



This last call will end on Thursday, December 21st.



Thanks,

Chris and Jeff
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to