Uma, Could you propose some specific text to add to the document to address your comment?
Thanks, Chris On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Uma Chunduri <[email protected]> wrote: > Support and have a following comment and want to see this addressed. > > > > Section 2: > > > > I saw SPF computation time has been discussed, while it is true this is > relatively a smaller issue when compared to mismatch in SPF delay with > different trigger algos across various vendors; it depends on the size of > the network + mix of legacy and new nodes. > > Any ways, my comment: > > I would like to see add one more bullet point with regard to SPF > computation order impact on the micro loops for a trigger i.e., a trigger > which is common to multiple levels/areas, multiple topologies and multiple > SPF-algorithms (in extreme case). > > There is no specified order today and its implementation dependent and IMO > this too would be a significant contributor (of course, not asking to > specify the order here) and visible once the SPF delay/trigger-algo issue is > fixed across. So this is worth being listed here. > > > > > > -- > > Uma C. > > > > From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:19 AM > To: RTGWG <[email protected]> > Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]> > Subject: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement > > > > RTGWG, > > This email starts the two week WG last call for > draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement/ > > > Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this > > informational document, along with the reasoning behind that support or > > opposition. > > > > IPR: > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to > > this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The > > response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will > > not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from > > each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. > > > > This last call will end on Thursday, December 21st. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris and Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
