Hi Tom, Thanks for pointing it out. The missing references have been added to the new revision: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-11.
Best regards, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 7:28 AM > To: Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> > Cc: rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-v...@ietf.org; routing WG > <rtgwg@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07.txt> (A YANG Data Model > for Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)) to Proposed Standard > > While I am at it... > > it would seem that this I-D, in any version thereof, lists > > RFC 2787: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Virtual Router Redundancy > Protocol. > > RFC 6527: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Virtual Router Redundancy > Protocol Version 3 (VRRPv3)."; > > in the YANG module but these RFC do not appear in any reference, either the > normative References or in the list of RFC referenced by the YANG module. > > Tom Petch > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alia Atlas" <akat...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 7:28 PM > > > Hi Tom, > > > > The announcement calls them out to see if they are acceptable > normative > > references (and is now > > nicely automatic after too many being missed). > > > > That said - for those that have been updated, the draft should be > updated > > as well. > > > > Thanks for noticing! > > Alia > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:18 AM, t.petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > > > > > I note that this has several downref listed in the announcement. > Two > > > these have been superseded (the I-D itself is out-of-date with > regard to > > > this as well). > > > > > > Is the announcement still valid? > > > > > > Just asking. > > > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "The IESG" <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:31 PM > > > > > > > > > > The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working > Group WG > > > > (rtgwg) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model > for > > > Virtual > > > > Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)' > > > > <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and > solicits > > > final > > > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > > > i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-12-12. Exceptionally, comments > may > > > be > > > > sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > > > beginning of > > > > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > > > > > Abstract > > > > > > > > > > > > This document describes a data model for Virtual Router > Redundancy > > > > Protocol (VRRP). Both version 2 and version 3 of VRRP are > covered. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ > > > > > > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ballot/ > > > > > > > > > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > > > > > > > The document contains these normative downward references. > > > > See RFC 3967 for additional information: > > > > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis: A YANG Data Model for IP > > > Management (None - IETF stream) > > > > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis: A YANG Data Model for > Interface > > > Management (None - IETF stream) > > > > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores: Network Management > Datastore > > > Architecture (None - IETF stream) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
