Rob

Good to see my comments addressed.

While you are at it

- YANG module copyright is 2016 which will get fixed but makes me notice
....

- Security Considerations is not the current template; should have
Normative References to SSH and TLS

- s5.1 has
draft [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis]).
which is now an RFC

- IANA Considerations references RFC7950.  As I learnt lately, RFC6020
is better here as all RFC7950 does is point you to RFC6020

-
"MAC address in the format of H-H-H, in which H is a
 hexadecimal number of 1 to 4 bits.";

If H has a maximum of 4 bits, then you have a 12 bit address, not quite
the MAC I see these days!  I wonder if it is better to leave this out
and let readers refer to RFC6991.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Wilton" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 6:17 PM

> The -01 version fixes some of the comments raised during WG adoption,
> but further work is in progress to improve the language, so expect a
> properly updated version before the IETF 103.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
> On 24/08/2018 18:13, [email protected] wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of
the IETF.
> >
> >          Title           : YANG Data Model for ARP
> >          Authors         : Feng Zheng
> >                            Bo Wu
> >                            Robert Wilton
> >                            Xiaojian Ding
> > Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01.txt
> > Pages           : 17
> > Date            : 2018-08-24
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     This document defines a YANG data model for the management of
the
> >     Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).  It extends the basic ARP
> >     functionality contained in the ietf-ip YANG data model, defined
in
> >     RFC 8344, to provide management of optional ARP features and
> >     statistics.
> >
> >     The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
> >     Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> >
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-arp-yang-model-01
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtgwg mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> > .
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to