Hi Linda,

We will start the wg adoption call within few days.
Thanks!

Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 14, 2019, 2:20 PM -0800, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>, wrote:
> Jeff and Chris,
>
> Can you start the RTGwg WG Adoption call for the following two drafts?
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/
>   This document describes the problems of enterprises face today in
>    connecting their branch offices to dynamic workloads in third party
>    data centers (a.k.a. Cloud DCs).
>
>    It examines some of the approaches for interconnecting workloads &
>    applications hosted in cloud DCs with enterprises' on-premises DCs &
>    branch offices. This document also describes some of the (network)
>    problems that many enterprises face when they have workloads &
>    applications & data split among hybrid data centers, especially for
>    those enterprises with multiple sites that are already
>    interconnected by VPNs (e.g. MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN) and leased lines.
>
>    Current operational problems in the field are examined to determine
>    whether there is a need for enhancements to existing protocols or
>    whether a new protocol is necessary to solve them.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-gap-analysis/
> This document analyzes the technological gaps when using SD-WAN to
>    interconnect workloads & apps hosted in various locations,
>    especially cloud data centers when the network service providers do
>    not have or have limited physical infrastructure to reach the
>    locations [Net2Cloud-problem].
>
>
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Linda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 2:55 AM
> To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>
> Cc: RTGWG <[email protected]>; Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]>; JACQUENET 
> Christian IMT/OLN <[email protected]>; Mehmet Toy 
> ([email protected]) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Ready for RTGwg WG adoption call for 
> draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement & Gap analysis
>
> Hi Linda,
>
> First of all - thanks for updating the drafts!
>
> I think starting the wg adoption call 2nd week of January would be right 
> time, since many folks are already on holidays and I’d really like the drafts 
> to be well reviewed.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> > On Dec 15, 2018, at 02:18, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Jeff and Chris,
> >
> > We have made some changes based on the IETF103 discussion.
> > We think the drafts are ready for WG adoption call.
> > Since there is only one week left before Christmas, is it better to start 
> > the adoption call now and extend to the New Year? Or start after the New 
> > Year?
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-gap-analysis/
> >
> > Thanks, Linda
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 6:12 PM
> > To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; Christian Jacquenet 
> > <[email protected]>; Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; 
> > Andrew Malis <[email protected]>; Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]>; 
> > Mehmet Toy <[email protected]>
> > Subject: New Version Notification for 
> > draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04.txt
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Linda Dunbar and posted to the IETF 
> > repository.
> >
> > Name:        draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
> > Revision:    04
> > Title:        Seamless Interconnect Underlay to Cloud Overlay Problem 
> > Statement
> > Document date:    2018-12-11
> > Group:        Individual Submission
> > Pages:        18
> > URL:            
> > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04.txt
> > Status:         
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/
> > Htmlized:       
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04
> > Htmlized:       
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
> > Diff:           
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document describes the problems of enterprises face today in
> >   connecting their branch offices to dynamic workloads in third party
> >   data centers (a.k.a. Cloud DCs).
> >
> >   It examines some of the approaches for interconnecting workloads &
> >   applications hosted in cloud DCs with enterprises' on-premises DCs &
> >   branch offices. This document also describes some of the (network)
> >   problems that many enterprises face when they have workloads &
> >   applications & data split among hybrid data centers, especially for
> >   those enterprises with multiple sites that are already
> >   interconnected by VPNs (e.g. MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN) and leased lines.
> >
> >   Current operational problems in the field are examined to determine
> >   whether there is a need for enhancements to existing protocols or
> >   whether a new protocol is necessary to solve them.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
> > tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to