The challenge I have in reviewing this I-D is the lack of references in
the YANG modules for the objects and actions defined therein. I like to
have references since they tell me how much I should expect to
understand, how familiar I should be with the material.
Here we now have references for the YANG import statements (which is
good) but we should also have references for many of the YANG
statements; look for example at
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-15
for an I-D with a comprehensive list of references in the YANG module.
It may be that here RFC 2697, RFC 2698, RFC3289 are all I need to know
but I would like to be told that before I start looking into the YANG.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "IETF Secretariat" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:01 AM
> The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Jeff Tantsura)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model/
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
