----- Original Message ----- From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 9:42 PM > Hi Tom, Jeff, > > We will be working on it before IETF105.
That is good. As I said, what I really would like is reference statements in the YANG module, but while you are at it, you might consider s.1 needs a reference for YANG 1.1 i,e, RFC7950 s.2 is the old boilerplate which lacks RFC8174 RFC8343 needs to be a Normative reference for the I-D RFC7223 is obsoleted by RFC8343 YANG guidelines says that RFC8340 should be a Informative Reference When you add the Security boilerplate, you will need some more references for that, ditto IANA Considerations Tom Petch > > -thanks, > Aseem > > From: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:40 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, tom petch <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" > Resent-From: <[email protected]> > Resent-To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Resent-Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:39 PM > > Tom, > > Thanks for your comments! > Co-authors - please work on these, I’d also expect you to have them incorporated in the version to be presented at IETF105. > > Cheers, > Jeff > On Jun 21, 2019, 9:50 AM -0700, tom petch <[email protected]>, wrote: > > The challenge I have in reviewing this I-D is the lack of references in > the YANG modules for the objects and actions defined therein. I like to > have references since they tell me how much I should expect to > understand, how familiar I should be with the material. > > Here we now have references for the YANG import statements (which is > good) but we should also have references for many of the YANG > statements; look for example at > draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-15 > for an I-D with a comprehensive list of references in the YANG module. > > It may be that here RFC 2697, RFC 2698, RFC3289 are all I need to know > but I would like to be told that before I start looking into the YANG. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "IETF Secretariat" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:01 AM > > > The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Jeff Tantsura) > > The document is available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model/ > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
