Peng, Thank you very much for the comments. Please see below the resolution to your comments.
Linda From: Peng Liu <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 11:47 PM To: jefftant.ietf <[email protected]>; rtgwg <[email protected]> Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement.all <[email protected]> Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement Hi, This document is helpful for the deployment of networks to Hybrid Cloud DCs, I think it is mature and I support the WGLC. Here are also some comments: 1. For section 3.3, there is RFC8490、RFC8765 of stateful DNS show the better performance to refresh the cache and handle session idle timeouts. It may provide more explanation to enhance this section. [Linda] Add the following sentence to the end of section 3.3: [RFC8490] and [RFC8765] of stateful DNS can be used to achieve better performance in refreshing the cache and handling session idle timeouts. 1. For section 4.2, suggest to add 'for example' before 'When applications in AWS..'. There are many examples of AWS, not sure if all of them should be pointed out the specific affilition, or some of them could be obscure as a upcoming RFC. [Linda] good suggestion. Added. Regards, Peng ________________________________ [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Jeff Tantsura<mailto:[email protected]> Date: 2023-12-06 05:44 To: RTGWG<mailto:[email protected]> CC: rtgwg-chairs<mailto:[email protected]>; draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement.all<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call the draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement draft. The authors have addressed all the comments received from the early reviews and shepherd (thanks Joel!). Please indicate support or no-support by December 20 2023. IPR: If you are listed as a document author or contributor and haven’t responded to the IPR call, please respond to this email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Thanks, Yingzhen and Jeff
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
