If this is allowed then tomorrow some other departments even the Parliament may 
ask for certain concessions and so on.
May I suggest to held a meeting of all the activist to meet at DELHI and if 
required stage DHARNA to save this act.  


On Thu, 01 May 2008 colnrkurup wrote :
>
>Why our Parliament want a pound of flesh ? At least let the RTI Act
>remain a model granting equity of justice. Any attempt to dilute this
>act should be resisted with tooth and nail. Neither our Parliament
>nor the judiciary has  sustained any previleges due to the RTI Act
>since last 30 months. If at all any amendment to be made on RTI Act
>it is only to bridle the CIC and SICs with accountability
>
>
>--- In [email protected], "Myth Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >
> > PRIVILEGES COMMITTEE - 'Parliament RTI query must specify the
>reasons'
> >   By PARUL CHANDRA
> > New Delhi
> >       Parliament may want the judiciary to come under the Right to
> > Information (RTI) scanner. But it wants certain concessions while
>coming
> > under scrutiny by the common man under the very same act.
> >
> > This is evident in the suggestion made by the Lok Sabha privileges
>committee
> > which has suggested that the RTI Act 2005 be amended so that an
>applicant
> > seeking information or documents from Parliament will have to
>specify the
> > reasons for asking thus. Under the present rules, applicants do not
>have to
> > state the reasons for seeking information which also includes the
> > Parliament.
> >
> > In the case of judiciary, the standing committee on personnel,
>public
> > grievances and law and justice's report was tabled in Parliament on
>Tuesday.
> > It clearly states that the judiciary comes under the purview of the
>RTI. It
> > had observed that "all three wings of state executive, legislature
>and
> > judiciary - are fully covered under this act, since all organs of
>the state
> > are accountable to the citizens of India in a democratic state".
> >
> > With regard to the Parliament, the privileges committee has also
>said that
> > if the Speaker feels that the information or documents sought under
>the RTI
> > "has the potential to call in question the proceedings of the House
>or of
> > any committee of the House in any court, he may be empowered to
>refer such a
> > request to the Committee of Privileges for examination and report".
> >
> > In yet another concession to Parliament, the committee has
>suggested that if
> > a reference is made to it, the time limit of 30 days for furnishing
>a reply
> > under the RTI may not applicable to it. And that the information or
> > documents sought may be provided "only if so recommended by the
>Committee of
> > Privileges and agreed to by the House".
> >
> > http://epaper.asianage.com/ArticleText.aspx?
>article=01_05_2008_005_003&mode=1
> >
> > --
> > Keep Fighting 498A
> > Keep Fighting Legal Terrorism
> > Keep Fighting Inequality in Justice
> >
> > http://legalterror.wordpress.com/
> > http://society.indianskeptic.com/
> >
> > "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you.
> > Then they fight you. Then you win." --- M.K.Gandhi
> >
> > If "con" is the opposite of "pro", then what is the opposite of
>progress?
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>


BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI
Saha-Prant Sangathan Mantri,
AKHIL BHARATIYA GRAHAK PANCHAYAT BRAJ PRANT,
2/40D, Janakpuri, Marrish Road, 
ALIGARH-202001.  INDIA
Phone:0571-2401557, MOB:-093597BIMAL
e.mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to