By wisely seeking information after information one is bound to get conflicting and contradictory information in cases unlawful practices are followed by the public servants . When one confromt the District Collector, Principal Secretary etc., with their own contradictions one get the reply that the earlier one was a clerical mistake. There canbe an odd clericalmistakes. But it look so odd that all cases where the fowl-play is expossed with their own reply the officials start defending that it was a clericalmistake. Then what is the status of the false report framed by the public servant ? Just telling that it is mistake does not repair the injury caused by such reports dunless the injuries cause by the admitted false report is repaired. In certin ases the Judiciary or quasi-judicial forums might have given a judgement based on the falsely frmed report. Of cource one can ask the status. But all second appeals on such inconvenient cases are kept aside by the SIC un-actioned. Any solution ?
