Dear Sidharth Have already replied to this one on [[Sackhim]] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sackhim/message/657 where Mr.Habibullah is a Moderator. (He is not a member of this group).
Sarbajit --- In [email protected], Sidharth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Forum, > > In the face of Blatant Bias shown by an Information Commissioner if a > complainant expresses his desire to change the constitution of a > bench, what is right thing to do? > > Ask him to go to High Court? A bizarre & prejudiced decision from > Central Information Commission. > > RTI & Legal Experts plz enlighten me on this. > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/OK-15092008-01.pdf > > Please download this decision and go through the same to get the real picture. > > > "As submitted by Shri Lalit Bhasin, Trustee, a review application can > > only be considered by this Commission in the absence of a specific > > provision for review in the RTI Act if an error in fact or in law is > > found. In this case the only ground for review, therefore, is whether > > this Commission has erred either in the opinion conveyed to Jawahar > > Lal Nehru Memorial Fund by the Central Information > > Commissioner in his letter of 7.8.2007 or by Information Commissioner > > Dr. O. P.Kejariwal in his order of 16.3.07. It was, therefore, felt > > necessary for both Information Commissioners to sit as a Division > > Bench to hear the Review Petition concerning both. However, in light > > of Shri Manna's lack of confidence in this Commission, the only > > recourse now open to him is in moving a Writ Petition against the > > decision of 21.11.07 of this Commission before the High Court of > > Delhi. > > > > This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Announced in the hearing." > > > > . >
