Dear Veeresha

Let us analyse this carefully

Mr.X (employee of PSU Bank) commits some blunder and a Departmental
Enquiry ensues. In the course of the enquiry it is entirely possible
that Mr.X is constrained to divulge certain personal information (such
as his assets) etc which is unconnected with his public activity.

The distinction made by IC(PB) (after pleadings were completed
properly) is that applicant "is in no way connected with the
information sought .. information is not related to him". In these
circumstances I would also tend to agree with IC(PB) reasoning that
there could be no possible public interest (especially since applicant
is not an affected person by his own admission) and the information is
sought concerning a particular individual only (third party as defined
in RTI Act and also thereby a "protected interest" qv. 8(2)).

I hope you see the common pitfalls to avoid. I would also suggest you
revise your conception of "public interest"

Let me also bluntly convey another concern. Organised NGO Touts (also
known as "RTI activists") on the instructions of foreign intelligence
agencies routinely use DE's etc. to "spot" corruptible public
servants. The late Masterji was not called "Master-ji" for his
teaching but for the ring of RTI spies he organised. Some of you
"foolish little RTI activists" may think you are doing public service
using RTI, whereas actually you are mere pawns in the hands of India's
enemies while your Indian Masters get Magsaysay awards.

http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/FB-12062008-01.pdf

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected], veeresh bellur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Dear Sarabjit,
>
> I request the group members to guide me in drafting application
while seeking information relating to Departmental Enquiries.  Order
issued by PB is being taken as guiding factor while disposing off rti
applicationin Public Sector Banks.  Infact procedure to be followed
undr Section 11 relating to third party information is also not being
followed by the PIOs.  Other Public Sectors and Central Government
Departmen ts are generally providing information on Departmental
Enquiries.  Why this information is being treated as third party
information only in Banking Industry.  
>
> Infact Suspension orders, copies of Charge Sheets and final orders
passed in the Departmental Enqiries are being published in Karnataka
State Government.  Therefore all information relating to DEs are
treated as public documents in Karnataka.  I am not aware the
situation in other States.  In another order CIC has allowed
inspection of Departmental Enquiry files in the Delhi Police
Department.  To my knowledge Departmental Enquiries are conducted
only when an employee violates the norms and rules set out by the
Organisations for its employees.  Any violation of norms and rules by
any of its employee will have to be treated as against Public
Interest.  Hence DEs are being conducted against employees to protect
the Public Interest as well interest of the Organisation.  Hence
classification of information as personal can not be accepted. 
However I request the group members to enlighten me in this aspect.
> 
> B.H. VEERESHA 
> MAHITHI HAKKU ADHYAYANA KENDRA 
> 54, 17TH CROSS, M C LAYOUT 
> VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 040 
> TEL.NO. 9448704693


Reply via email to