Further proof that RTI_India is the only RTI group where members are not censored or moderated. Which is all the more reason why this unique mailing list should not be abused.
--- On Tue, 12/2/08, Yahoo! Groups Notification <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Yahoo! Groups Notification <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Message to INDIARTI group not approved Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 1:28 PM Hello, Your message to the INDIARTI group was not approved. The owner of the group controls the content posted to it and has the right to approve or reject messages accordingly. In this case, your message was automatically rejected because the moderator didn't approve it within 14 days. We do this to provide a high quality of service for our users. A complete copy of your message has been attached for your convenience. Thank you for choosing Yahoo! Groups Regards, Yahoo! Groups Customer Care Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Forwarded Message: Fwd: Re: Corrupt decisions by Corrupt Information Commissioners Fwd: Re: Corrupt decisions by Corrupt Information Commissioners Tuesday, November 4, 2008 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Ashish, This is an extremely serious allegation. I am personally surprised that Shaileshbhai has tipped his hand so early in the game, and in such a blatant manner. Since the allegation is serious and coming from you sure to be well founded, I would request our members to forward Ashish's post to other RTI groups so that we coordinate on this. PS: What does babudom plan to do now ? Sarbajit --- In [email protected], "ashish kr1965" <ashishkr1965@> wrote: > > We sincerely hope that the Information Commissioners of India institute > a vigilance enquiry into the following decisions of their brother > Shri Shailesh Gandhi. > > The charge is that Shri Shailesh Gandhi (recently appointed) has favoured > an Appellant and misused his office to direct that a top-secret list > of officers awaiting sanction for prosecution from LG office be given > to Ms.Shruti Singh Chauhan. > > The address of Ms Chauhan is that of Parivartan, a constituent of > the NCPRI of which Mr. Shailesh Gandhi was the head immediately > prior to his elevation. Mr. Gandhi ought to have recused himself from > this matter, however, he proceeded to misuse his office to favour his > former associates. > > The links to these decisions are:- > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/SG-16102008-06.pdf > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/SG-10102008-14.pdf > > Ashish Kappu > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
