Hi,

I do agree with what out moderator had said. As the decision of SIC/ CIC are 
case sensetive, one can not held them legal or illegal, without referring the 
facts. Best remedy is to approach the CIC/ SIC with full homework, with strong 
drafting of appeals, leaving minimum chance to get the orders against. This is 
possible  though the support of senior RTIers with vast experience.

S M Gala
 




________________________________
From: sroy1947 <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 3:47:57 PM
Subject: [rti_india] Re: Challenging illegal orders of CIC and SIC in High 
Courts


Hi

(NB:I am a Moderator of this group)

Orders of CIC/SIC do not set precedents. CICs are not courts of
record. CIC is not competent to settle questions of law. Hence each
matter at CIC is to be heard and decided on it's own merits. 

People who whine about "illegal orders of CIC/SIC" are incompetent.
At this group we strongly condemn the incompetent applicants
/appellants who approach CIC/SIC and get poor orders which cause
trouble for the rest of us brilliant RTIers. 

Furthermore, at this group we do not advise our members to go off to
High Court /SC against these so called illegal orders. In fact we
strongly urge them not to do so. Our rationale is that if you feel
that CIC/SIC are heartless corrupt buggers - you will be regarding
them as saints once you encounter our superior judiciary. I can say
with certitude that at least 50% of our higher judiciary is not
entirely honest.

Manoj Kamra had posted the link to Mr Jalan's PIL kit. You may note 2
things a) that the author admits therein that he has just passed out
of Mumbai Univ. b) that Mr Jalan could not stand our group's rigour
and resigned.

PS: We do not encourage publishing one's contact particulars / mobile
numbers via this group. Members have been expelled for less.

Ciao

Sarbajit

--- In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, sanjiva dayal <sanjivadayal@ ...> wrote:
>
> Dear Citizen/activists,
> Illegal orders passed by SIC and CIC can only be vacated through
writs in High Courts and not through agitation/dharna/ pradarshan. An
order passed in a judicial/quasi- judicial proceedings attains
finality if not challenged in higher courts. SIC and CIC have already
passed innumerable orders which are against the provisions and
definitions of the RTI Act and the PIO's are using these illegal
orders against the citizens for wrongly denying information. Very few
writs have been filed in High Courts against these illegal orders of
SIC/CIC indicating that most of the RTI activists/ngo' s are not
interested in filing writs in High Courts but are more interested in
agitation/dharna/ pradarshan. The issues for which agitation/dharna/
pradarshan are held can be legally enforced through High Court and
Supreme Court orders with much less money and resource. I call upon
all citizens/activists to file writs in High Courts against illegal
orders/actions of SIC/CIC
> and to
> support each other in doing so and all such citizens/activists can
contact me for the same.
> 
> 
> Sanjiva Dayal, B.Tech.(I.I. T. Kanpur) 
> Address:A-602, Twin Towers, Lakhanpur, Kanpur-208024, INDIA.
> Phones:+91-512- 2581532,2581426.
> Mobile:9415134052
> Business email:sanjivadayal@ ...
> Personal email:sanjivadayal@ ...
> 
> --- On Tue, 12/30/08, sanjiva dayal <sanjivadayal@ ...> wrote:
> 
> From: sanjiva dayal <sanjivadayal@ ...>
> Subject: [rti_india] Challenging illegal orders of CIC and SIC in
High Courts
> To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2008, 4:08 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I am using RTI to deal with cases of scams/fraud/ corruption of
national importance. CIC and SIC have passed illegal orders in my
cases which needs to be challenged in High Court. Can anybody help me?
> 
> Sanjiva Dayal, B.Tech.(I.I. T. Kanpur) 
> Address:A-602, Twin Towers, Lakhanpur, Kanpur-208024, INDIA.
> Phones:+91-512- 2581532,2581426.
> Mobile:9415134052
> Business email:sanjivadayal@ yahoo.com
> Personal email:sanjivadayal@ hotmail.com
> 
> --- On Tue, 12/30/08, rajen dharod <rajen_dharod@ yahoo.co. in> wrote:
> 
> From: rajen dharod <rajen_dharod@ yahoo.co. in>
> Subject: [rti_india] (unknown)
> To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com
> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2008, 2:53 PM
> 
> Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without
download. Go to http://in.webmessen ger.yahoo. com/
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to