And which is precisely why (as per media reports in leading newspapers) a SC judge was allegedly present in his capacity as "observer" while the assets were being transferred. <ho-ho>.
If there is anyone left in this group who believes in the honesty / integrity of the superior judiciary (or the information commissioners), please speak up now or hold your case forever. My own working rule, never believe anyone who has accepted a single naye paise from the government. Even the so-called great transparency 'neta' Jaiprakash Narayan (former babu) is now found to be embroiled in the Satyam scam in supplying ambulances to State governments. We are expected to believe that this person who was secretary to Governor and also CM of A.P. (one of India's most corrupt states) is a saint. All these ex-babu "saints" and "sadhvis" are packed into the National Advisory Council. We now also have the disgraceful example of people campaigning for some Arun Bhatia (another babu) in Pune. Are these the people who will lecture us on RTI and transparency ? --- In [email protected], "Rakesh Agarwal" <rak...@...> wrote: > > So SC judges have disputes amongst themselves which can be resolved by the > "competent authority" by looking up assets statements of his brother judges. > Thanks for the clarification! I think the Punjab and Haryana High Court > needs to have a similar arrangement because they are in the habit of > disturbing the delicate balance by delivering one's share to another. This > is unfair. Somebody's got to ensure equitable and fair distribution of > "assets". > > > > Rakesh Agarwal
