I fully agree with Mr Jain, corrupt judiciary, politicians, bureaucrats are in fact breeders of terrorism, when a person feels that he cannot get justice in normal course, he/she chooses path of snatching justice, ultimately leading to taking law into own hands, which is termed as violence/terrorism. S.K.KAPPOR
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, S. K. Jain <[email protected]> wrote: From: S. K. Jain <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Remarks from CJI on CIC decision To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 11:54 AM MODERATORS NOTE: This message and also Rakesh Agrawal's messages on this thread were identified by Yahoo as SPAM. Consequently there is a delay in these messages being posted to the group till approved by a moderator. We now have Yahoo's SPAM protection at maximum level. Messages CC'ed to multiple groups, or containing many external links, or with common subject tags are automatically flagged as SPAM by Yahoo. If we circulate such messages then this group is identified as a SPAMMER. So be careful and cooperate. Sarbajit <post> Very Rightly said. Its the judiciary with hand in hand with corrupt babus that even judges bow their heads in front of them. Terrorists are often clean with poor family backgrounds with aim to create terror openly but rich corrupt babus and corrupt judges are more dangerous than terrorists who are continuously poisoning our society with rich cultural and ethical moral heritage. You must have read the paper that there are no records of academic qualifications of high court and supreme court judges. So how come they were appointed without academic qualifications ? Without merit how did they acquire judicial seats to award sentences to poor and save corrupt rich influentials ? Some judges own wealth in several crores that even most corrupt politicians with criminal backgrounds might not be having it with them. A society which does not have transparency can never have respect to human rights and moral values. Judiciary is last hope for a victim but corrupt judiciary kills the victims again by passing orders in favour of rich corrupt influential people. Soon you will see Satyam fame Raju Lingam close friend of ex-CM Chandrababu Naidu walking as free man giving speeches in learned consortiums. Andhra Pradesh bureaucracy and its politicians are worst than killer dacoits of Chambal and this is where our extra ordinarily highly talented learned IC Tiwari (he ought have been in International Court of Justice and not CIC) comes from. For a kind person even a bleeding bird makes him/her painful who makes every effort to minimize the pain of living creature but what can be said about persons who are true friends of butchers killing human beings by means of corruption. Example is Bishnoi community in Rajasthan protects animals and trees while barren Andhra Pradesh tops in animal killings that even the zoo animals in enclosures are not safe (few years back a tigress was killed in zoo for its skin). Sanjiv Kumar Jain At 08:02 AM 1/11/2009, you wrote: >This speaks about mind set of our Judiciary, they think themselves >as "GOD", above law. They do not want to be accountable. nexus >between corrupt politician and judiciary is responsible for this >state of affairs, why our Govt is not able to make judges >accountable, inspite of daily hearing of corruption in Judiciary? > >S.K.Kapoor > >--- On Sun, 1/11/09, Rakesh Agarwal ><<mailto:rakesh% 40nyayabhoomi. org>rak...@nyayabhoomi. org> wrote: > >From: Rakesh Agarwal <<mailto:rakesh% 40nyayabhoomi. org>rak...@nyayabhoomi. >org> >Subject: [rti_india] Remarks from CJI on CIC decision >To: ><mailto:HumJanenge %40yahoogroups. co.in>humjane...@yahoogro ups.co.in, ><mailto:rti_ india%40yahoogro ups.com>rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, ><mailto:rti4empowe rment%40yahoogro ups.com>rti4empowerment@ yahoogroups. com, ><mailto:kria% 40yahoogroups. com>k...@yahoogroups. com >Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 6:41 PM > >Does the CJI want to file an "appeal" against the decision of CIC? I suggest >he better read the RTI Act first. Someone also ought to tell him RTI Act is >"the legislative mandate" that he thinks does not exist. > >Rakesh Agarwal > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
